quote:
If I could run both projector off the same computer, that would be great. However, they would need to be showing two different things. So will that mean that I will have to have to different computers? Here's what I will be doing with the projectors.
1. Advertising of sponsor's logos
2. Projecting hockey players pictures starting line up of each team.
3. Projecting hockey training videos
4. Record players, then do a video analysis of their training.
5. Project up coming events at the facility
I suppose you haven't priced out large LCD screens yet? Well, hockey... silver screens are cheap compared to an LCD display. Running a projector isn't that big of a deal. You'd probably want a second monitor and a monitor splitter for that channel and send your projected video to that display, which could run something as simple as Windows Media Player. But there are better solutions, just not sure what. I know Nero would tank and Sony Vegas isn't designed for that.
This basically sounds like a single computer thing for that application. What I would do is use something like Windows Movie Maker or Nero or Roxio(or Sony Vegas if you want to spend some bucks) and make your own "slideshows" and make them into AVI's that you could loop endlessly.
Heck, go one better. If your projector has various inputs, you could burn a DVD of your promotion slideshows and use a DVD player for playing your "commercials" while you use that computer to do other things. You can drop in audio too. But that's a whole other discussion.
[QUOTE}
Is a controller better for lighting than a computer? I'm not very knowledgeable about lighting and sound, I'm a hockey coach.
However, I have had this idea about designing my own night club since I was 21, I would just like to design my Ice Rink with all of the lighting and music instead.
[/QUOTE]
Controller vs computer? Sort of a "different strokes for different folks" sort of question. Might want to go computer since the 3D visualizer is really neat in MyDMX. Jingles could direct you if Compu Live would be the better purchase. My thoughts, since I'm a hardcore audio guy: Get a controller for back-up of the computer. Plan your DMX channel assignments to work with both environments and put some basic scenes into the controller. Should one crap out, you've got a back-up.
quote:
Any help you can give me would be great. For instance, how does DMX really work? I guess I can check on line to see how DMX work. But now that you know the extent of my knowledge as far a lighting goes, you can see what kind of work is cut out for you.
Headcoach
Using DMX is very easy. Basically, is's a data protocol that runs over DMX cabling, which looks exactly like microphone cabling. And even though microphone cabling is compatible, don't use it, OK? Good. DMX is a streaming data protocol that, despite it saying "multiplex", by textbook definitions, it is not multiplexing, but again, that's another discussion. Using DMX, you can control movers, scanners, intels and items on dimmer and switching packs. DMX is simple to wire. It can be as easy as "goes into this fixture, then out that fixture and into the next" and so on. Should you have things really spread out, you get a DMX splitter/repeater, which will duplicate that signal over multiple runs. You'll get the hang of it real fast.
You might just want to hire someone to install it all for you then show you basically how it works. After that, have fun playing with it.